Science Miscellany

A great quote from Robin Ince, who was asked to sit on a panel entitled ‘Is science the new religion?’

‘The answer to “is science the new religion?” is obviously yes, so long as you redefine religion as “a self-correcting, evidence based system of exploring the universe which attempts to unearth the least wrong laws and theories that can explain what exists or might exist whilst accepting that room must always be left for doubt and further enquiry”.’

The rest of his post is thoughtful and thought-provoking also, especially to those of us who have to deal with parents of patients, and acquaintances, who claim to have researched an issue when what they really mean is they googled it.

Richard Lehman’s journal review this week is ironic and biting as usual, with some great links. His evaluation of the poor science underlying all the calls to reduce salt intake (and his links to various papers evaluating the evidence in detail) is comforting for someone who sprinkles sodium liberally on a lot of cooking.

My favorite science writer on the internet is Ed Yong, his blog ‘not exactly rocket science‘ is a treasure trove, and his ‘missing links’ section points out, every week or so, other excellent science writing. He manages to explain things to non-specialists without dumbing down (at least only enough for a non-specialist to understand). A great new post from him, about the Monarch Butterfly I found fascinating. We have Monarchs in Quebec of course, and our Monarchs migrate 4000 kilometers to overwinter in the mountains of Mexico. Its an amazing journey for such a fragile creature, even more amazing that no one butterfly makes the whole journey, they reproduce en route and the next generation is able to complete the journey.

Posted in Neonatal Research | Leave a comment

Touch by therapists is not ‘Therapeutic Touch’

Honda N, Ohgi S, Wada N, Loo KK, Higashimoto Y, Fukuda K: Effect of therapeutic touch on brain activation of preterm infants in response to sensory punctate stimulus: A near-infrared spectroscopy-based study. Archives of Disease in Childhood – Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2013, 98(3):F244-F248. This is an interesting trial showing changes in brain activation (if that is the correct term) when the infants were tucked, restrained and held during a mildly disturbing stimulus, compared to when that was not done. The big problem with this study is the title. This is not ‘Therapeutic Touch’. Therapeutic Touch is a non-science based quackery which is based on manipulating non-existent energy fields, and does not require the patient to actually be touched. The intervention in this trial was much more like a number of other interventions which have previously been studied and shown effective for pain, such as kangaroo care and facilitated tucking. Skin to skin contact and restraint of the baby reduce signs of pain.

This is how therapeutic touch is described by the TT network of Ontario ‘Therapeutic Touch™ is an energy-field modality that is a contemporary interpretation of several ancient healing practices. Webster’s Dictionary defines “modality” in the medical sense as “the application of a therapeutic agent.” In Therapeutic Touch, the ‘agent’ is the conscious intent of the practitioner to balance and modulate the energy flow through and around the body of the client.  This is done by using the hands of the practitioner as a focus to facilitate the natural healing process.’

They continue with the following drivel

  • In a state of health, life energy flows freely in, through and out of each person’s energy field in an orderly manner.
  • When disease or injury occurs, the flow of energy is affected and may be described as obstructed, disordered or depleted.
  • Therapeutic Touch practitioners influence the energy flow to restore the integrity of the field and to move it toward wholeness and health.

That certainly isn’t what Honda and colleagues were doing. They were evaluating a real physiologic intervention that has nothing to do with restoring the integrity of the life energy field!

Posted in Neonatal Research | Leave a comment

Blog Updates

I have updated the page with the list of publications from our group since 2003. We are now up to 280! Keep it up colleagues.

I have also updated the ‘recent presentations’ page with the ppt files that I used in my 2 recent talks in Atlanta.

Posted in Neonatal Research | Leave a comment

Oh I do like to be beside the (Mediterranean) seaside

For years we have heard about the mediterranean diet and the anomalous finding that despite relatively high dietary fat intake the people living in Greece, Italy, Southern France (in particular) have very low frequency of vascular disease. This has been ascribed to the particular characteristics of the ‘mediterranean diet’ with its high intake of olive oil, especially extra-virgin olive oil, which is rich in polyphenols and monounsaturated fat, and mixed nuts which are rich in polyphenols, monounsaturated fat, and polyunsaturated fat, including alpha-linolenic acid.

A recently published article in the PNEJM actually performed the first big prospective randomized trial of primary prevention of vascular disease in high risk men and women, over 55 for men, over 60 for women, with other risk factors or type 2 diabetes. The intervention was dietary advice to eat a mediterranean diet with extra extra-virgin olive oil (1 litre a week!) or extra mixed nuts (30 g a day).

They stopped the trial early as there were much more composite endpoints (myocardial infarction, stroke or cardiovascular death) in the controls.

The diet included advice to use extra-virgin olive oil as the only dietary oil (including for cooking) and at least 7 glasses of wine a week.

I think I am part way there….

Posted in Neonatal Research | Leave a comment

Bugs in the news

Many thanks to Girish Deshpande for sending me a link to an Australian news item about probiotics and their use in the preterm, a 2 minute video clip for your edification.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-04-10/new-hope-for-premature-babies/4619984

The excellent science blogs ‘Phenomena’ have an article about probiotics, not at all neonatal, but talking about the overall importance of microbiome manipulation for the future.

I spoke about the science of probiotics in Atlanta 2 days ago at the organization of Georgia neonatologists, Annie followed with a talk about the politics of probiotics, which was of course the title of a recent article that we published with John Lantos.

I usually think of the GI microbiome in terms of what bugs are in the colon, this new article (Milisavljevic V, Garg M, Vuletic I, Miller J, Kim L, Cunningham T, Schroder I: Prospective assessment of the gastroesophageal microbiome in vlbw neonates. BMC Pediatrics 2013, 13(1):49). analyzed the microbiome of the stomach and esophagus in very preterm infants in an NICU, many of the samples grew germs and they were not very nice ones. Coagulase negative staph and a range of potentially pathogenic Gram negative organisms were found.

We cannot keep the gut of the preterm baby sterile. Encouraging colonization with good probiotic organisms, several of which, with good quality control, are available in the USA and elsewhere in the world, is both rational and evidence based. ABCDophilus, used in the recently completed and positive ProPrems trial is actually made in the USA.

Posted in Neonatal Research | Tagged , | Leave a comment

My tribute to Margaret Thatcher

Annie keeps telling me I should write something about Maggie. I can do no better than to redirect anyone who wants a more honest evaluation of her legacy than all the hagiography in the press over the last few days to this article http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/the_woman_who_wrecked_great_britain/.

I will quote one sentence ‘Margaret Thatcher was a zealot, a friend to the worst mass murderers of the 1980s, a force for antisocial cruelty, and her violent means of ending the great British experiment in social democracy made the country a more brutal, less equal country’. Farewell Maggie.

Posted in Neonatal Research | 1 Comment

Parents can do stuff.

A report from Mount Sinai hospital in Toronto of an innovative program to integrate parents much more into the day to day care of babies in the NICU. (O’Brien K, Bracht M, Macdonell K, McBride T, Robson K, O’Leary L, Christie K, Galarza M, Dicky T, Levin A et al: A pilot cohort analytic study of family integrated care in a canadian neonatal intensive care unit. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2013, 13(Suppl 1):S12.) Free access to full text.This is a pilot study performed as a prospective case-control design. Babies who were no longer ventilated, but could be stable on CPAP, and had more than 50% of their feeds enterally were eligible if a parent was available to spend at least 8 hours a day in the NICU.

There was a fairly intensive educational intervention, and the parents took over a lot of the things that are currently usually done by the nurses, for 8 hours a day between the hours of 7 am and 8 pm.

‘Parents were also expected to provide care for their infant(s), especially in the areas of feeding, bathing, dressing, holding, and providing skin-to-skin care, perform basic charting, and maintain a record of their own learning regarding their proficiency in providing care for their infant(s) in the NICU. Nurses remained responsible for more technical aspects of the infant’s care, such as insertion of nasogastric catheters, placement of CPAP prongs, oral suctioning, and adjustment of oxygen concentrations.’

The primary outcome of this pilot was to a measure of growth, the change in the z score between enrollment and 21 days. It was a little better in the Family Integrated Care Infants, but not significantly. Among the other outcomes they examined, there were many more mothers breastfeeding at discharge, and perhaps fewer nosocomial infections, less retinopathy and fewer reports of adverse incidents.

Now this isn’t the most rigorous design, but I think it was appropriate for this pilot project, and it certainly suggests that integrating families more into the care of their babies may have substantial benefits on short term outcomes.

I asked Katharina Staub, a parent representative who is founder and president of the Canadian Premature Babies Foundation to comment:

As a parent of premature twins born at 27 weeks in 2008, I can only applaud this type of approach to the care of premature infants.

Having spoken to one of the mothers who participated in this initial study, it was clear that her participation in the study made for a very positive experience in the NICU. Her anxiety was reduced because of her extensive involvement in the daily care of her baby.

For parents it is empowering to be supported by the staff in the training of how to take care of your baby in the NICU. It gives you confidence to be part of the healing of their child.

What most parents view as normal with a full term child, the act of parenting, feeding, caring for the infant is not so easy in the NICU. This type of care gives a great basis for bonding with your child. It will be interesting to see the results of the Canada wide study that has started in 16 centres.

Katharina Staub Canadian Premature Babies Foundation.

Posted in Neonatal Research | Leave a comment

Neonatal Updates #28

Ritter BC, Nelle M, Perrig W, Steinlin M, Everts R: Executive functions of children born very preterm-deficit or delay? Eur J Pediatr 2013, 172(4):473-483. In the last updates I mentioned a good review article of executive function in ex-preterm infants. This new article compares ex-very preterm infants to controls as they get older. In the ex-preterm group who were younger (8 to 10 years old) there was a significant decrement in their executive function abilities. In the older ones (10 to 12 years old) in contrast there was no difference from controls. The authors interpret this as showing that the lower executive function abilities described in the very preterm group are a delay, rather than a deficit.

Jain A, Deshpande P, Shah P: Peripherally inserted central catheter tip position and risk of associated complications in neonates. J Perinatol 2013, 33(4):307-312. When you put in a picc in a very preterm baby, if the tip of the catheter sticks in the mid-clavicular region, it is more likely to infiltrate and need removal. On the other hand if you can get it a little further, to the middle third of the clavicle so the tip starts to turn downward, then the results are as good as getting in the SVC.

Benzies K, Magill-Evans J, Hayden K, Ballantyne M: Key components of early intervention programs for preterm infants and their parents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2013, 13(Suppl 1):S10. This review examined which components of early intervention programs are useful. They conclude ‘Positive and clinically meaningful effects of early interventions were seen in some psychosocial aspects of mothers of preterm infants.’ which is great. They did not identify which components of the interventions improve preterm outcomes, which is probably the only way we can get funding for them

Posted in Neonatal Research | Leave a comment

Spitting Up, it is normal

A new study in Pediatrics asked parents how they would feel about a hypothetical scenario. They gave a history of a patient who is spitting up, possiting, regurgitating or whatever you want to call it, and either gave it  a disease label GERD, gastro-esophageal reflux DISEASE, or not. They also told half of the parents (factorial design) that medications were probably ineffective. (Scherer LD, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Fagerlin A, Tarini BA: Influence of “gerd” label on parents’ decision to medicate infants. Pediatrics 2013.) Once the label was attached to the clinical scenario, parents were more likely to want to treat the baby with medications, even when they had been told that they don’t work!

This is accompanied by a short and pertinent editorial with a good title. ‘The hazards of medicalizing variants of normal’. Carey WB:Pediatrics 2013.

Posted in Neonatal Research | Tagged | Leave a comment

The girl who demanded school (not neonatology)

This is a great TEDx talk from a girl from Kenya who…. well read the description on the Guardian page and watch the talk. Very inspiring tale, (after the nauseating start).

Posted in Neonatal Research | Leave a comment