-
Recent Posts
breathe, baby, breathe
- Analgesia
- anemia
- antenatal steroids
- antibiotics
- anticonvulsants
- Apnea
- asphyxia
- Assisted ventilation
- BPD
- Breast-feeding
- breast milk
- CMV
- Conflicts of Interest
- Congenital Heart Disease
- Convulsions
- CPAP
- Delayed Cord Clamping
- diaphragmatic hernia
- ECMO
- EEG
- End-of-life decisions
- endotracheal intubation
- enteral feeding
- erythropoietin
- Ethics
- families
- Fluids
- Gastro-oesophageal reflux
- Genetic tests
- Global Neonatal Health
- Handicap
- Head Ultrasound
- Health Care Organization
- Heart Surgery
- Hemodynamics
- Hyperglycemia
- Hypoglycemia
- Hypotension
- Hypothermia
- hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy
- infection control
- intracranial hemorrhage
- Lactoferrin
- long term outcomes
- lung compliance
- microbiome
- mortality
- MRI
- Necrotising Enterocolitis
- Nitric Oxide
- nutrition
- Obstetrics
- oxygen therapy
- oxygen toxicity
- pain
- PDA
- Prebiotics
- Preventing Prematurity
- Probiotics
- pulmonary physiology
- Quality Improvement
- Randomized Controlled Trials
- Research Design
- respiratory support
- Resuscitation
- Retinopathy of Prematurity
- Sepsis
- statistics
- steroids
- surfactant treatment
- Survival
- Systematic Reviews
- transfusion
- trisomy
- twins
Respire, bébé, respire!
RSS Links
Canadian Premature Babies Foundation
Sainte Justine Hospital
Canadian Neonatal Network
Préma-Québec
Categories
Transport Néonatal
Archives
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- January 2022
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
Meta
Tag Archives: Research Design
Composite outcomes for research; this is how to do it!
As regular readers of the blog will know, I have been very critical of some very important, otherwise excellent, trials over one vital part of their design, that is, the use of composite outcomes such as “death or BPD”, “death … Continue reading
Should we feed insulin to preterm babies?
This was an idea I had not heard about prior to seeing this newly published trial (Mank E, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Enteral Recombinant Human Insulin in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2022). The introduction … Continue reading
Posted in Neonatal Research
Tagged enteral feeding, Randomized Controlled Trials, Research Design
4 Comments
Which is worse; death or a low Bayley score? Comparing composite outcomes between groups, taking into account clinical priorities.
I keep harping on about this issue as I think we make a mistake in the design of our research studies when we include death and a much less important outcome in composite outcomes. For example in the STOP-BPD trial, … Continue reading
Longer term outcomes; what should we measure? part 1.
Many important trials include follow-up to about 2 years in order to ascertain longer-term effects. Such as this one: Adams-Chapman I, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome of preterm infants enrolled in myo-inositol randomized controlled trial. J Perinatol. 2021. Ira Adams-Chapman was … Continue reading
Posted in Neonatal Research
Tagged long term outcomes, Randomized Controlled Trials, Research Design
2 Comments
What respiratory outcomes are important?
When bronchopulmonary dysplasia was first described by Northway in 1967 he didn’t try to produce a definition, his paper was a description of a small number of preterm survivors of high oxygen and positive pressure ventilation. He noted some years … Continue reading
Posted in Neonatal Research
Tagged BPD, Randomized Controlled Trials, Research Design, Systematic Reviews
1 Comment
Research Outcomes in Neonatology : must do better.
When planning a research project with neonatal patients the first question should be, what am I investigating? The PICO outline : standing for Patients, Intervention, Controls (or comparison) and Outcome, is a standardized way of asking the simple question. If … Continue reading
To p or not to p, what is the alternative?
I started writing the previous post several weeks ago, and, of course, the ideas are not original with me, in fact, a whole recent issue of “The American Statistician” is dedicated to not just trying to eliminate talk of statistical … Continue reading
To p or not to p, that is the question.
I can’t claim preference for this title, although I wish I could. I copied it from an article published in an ENT journal (Buchinsky FJ, Chadha NK. To P or Not to P: Backing Bayesian Statistics. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. … Continue reading
Death or oxygen, which is worse?
We have a big problem in neonatal research. We have constructed composite outcomes that have become the “standard of design”, but are not of much use for anyone. Because we are, rightly, concerned that death and other diagnoses may be … Continue reading
Posted in Neonatal Research
Tagged mortality, Randomized Controlled Trials, Research Design, steroids
6 Comments
Reading Research: Subgroups and Observational studies
In publications of randomized controlled trials, subgroup analyses are frequently performed. The idea behind such analyses being to determine whether one group or another has a different result to the overall results, for example, whether boys or girls have more … Continue reading
Neonatal Research 