Is your brain really necessary?

I remember years ago watching a BBC documentary (I think it was BBC) with the tabloid-type title “is your brain really necessary?” it focused on patients with severe hydrocephalus who had normal neurological examinations and normal intellect. One was, if I remember right, a university student, in geography or some-such, who had a cortical mantle thickness of about 1 cm.

A recent article, discussed by Neuroskeptic, has reported some new cases, and made ridiculous claims suggesting that this is evidence that our memories are stored in the cloud and accessed by magic (or some unknown electromagnetic wave particle).

A new case report in the Lancet is of a 62 year old with this MRI, a woman with apparently normal function:

Full-size image (104 K)

Which just shows again how little correlation there is between images and function, under some circumstances. Another one of those circumstances for example is patients with meningomyelocele:

This very recent article for example looked at young adolescents with meningomyelocele who were all shunted for hydrocephalus. The average IQ was about 1SD below controls. The study showed poor correlation between mantle thickness in most areas and IQ, and no correlation at all in some areas of the brain. This study also looked at gyrification, and at fine motor skills. There are a number of very interesting associations, which confirm that, in general, cerebral development is disturbed in meningomyelocele, and that the more disturbed it is, the more affected are fine motor skills. Some of the associations start to get complicated, but I just wanted to point out that the statistically significant correlations are interesting from a research point of view, but are not all that strong; as in many other situations, we should be very circumspect about making individual predictions of outcome from brain imaging findings.

A child with an antenatal diagnosis of meningomyelocele can have a range of developmental and neurologic challenges, but the degree of hydrocephalus and other findings on ante- or post-natal cerebral imaging do not closely predict their eventual function.

About keithbarrington

I am a neonatologist and clinical researcher at Sainte Justine University Health Center in Montréal
This entry was posted in Neonatal Research and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Is your brain really necessary?

  1. Toni Starr says:

    I remember the original research. Done by a professor in Sheffield, UK – can’t remember his name. The guy with virtually no cortex was a maths graduate, and his only symptom was some kind of endocrine effect, plus a mildly raised head circumference. I think they recruited their subjects by just plucking them off the street and asking them to consent to MRIs. Of course you wouldn’t get the most compromised subjects walking the street in the first place.

    • The professor was John Lorber, whose reputation is a bit spotty now, he invented the Lorber criteria for kids with myelomeningocele, criteria for deciding which kids should not have surgery. I think I’m right in saying he later repudiated those criteria.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s