Study performed partly because of potential long term impacts found in the PINT trial (below). 1,800 ELBW babies randomized to higher or lower transfusion threshold. No advantage found of earlier transfusion in either short or long term outcomes. There was absolutely no sign of any difference in Bayley scores. The low transfusion thresholds were safe, and led to fewer babies being transfused.
Comparison of two different transfusion threshold algorithms in 450 ELBW infants, enrolled at <48 h of age. No impact of more restrictive transfusions on any primary or secondary outcome, but many fewer transfusions in the restricted group.
This was a report of the longer term outcomes of the PINT trial, no differences were found in the planned analysis. A post-hoc analysis (always a dangerous thing to do) suggested that there was maybe an advantage in cognitive scores to the liberal transfusion group.
This European trial of different transfusion thresholds randomized 1000 infants <1000g at <72 hours of age. 40% of the low threshold group avoided transfusion, compared to 20% of the high threshold babies. The primary outcome was survival to 2 years without disability. There were no differences in outcome between the groups. Either in the parts of the primary outcome or in NEC, BPD or RoP.
Platelets
Comparison of platelet transfusions at a threshold of either 50,000 or 25,000 in newborns not actively bleeding. No advantage of transfusing sooner, in fact there was more bleeding in the group who were transfused sooner. There were few very preterm babies in the first 48 hours of life, so little confidence for the impact on IVH, but no evidence of any benefit.







